|
Sino Biological
recombinant gal 8 Figure S1 and Recombinant Gal 8, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant gal 8/product/Sino Biological Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant gal 8 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Gator Bio Inc
hfc probes Figure S1 and Hfc Probes, supplied by Gator Bio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/hfc probes/product/Gator Bio Inc Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hfc probes - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
gal 8 capture elisa Figure S1 and Gal 8 Capture Elisa, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/gal 8 capture elisa/product/R&D Systems Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gal 8 capture elisa - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
goat polyclonal anti gal8 antibody Figure S6 . " width="250" height="auto" />Goat Polyclonal Anti Gal8 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/goat polyclonal anti gal8 antibody/product/R&D Systems Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat polyclonal anti gal8 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
recombinant full length human gal8 Figure S6 . " width="250" height="auto" />Recombinant Full Length Human Gal8, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant full length human gal8/product/R&D Systems Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant full length human gal8 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
91/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Proteintech
ag13874 Figure S6 . " width="250" height="auto" />Ag13874, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/ag13874/product/Proteintech Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ag13874 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
antibody gal 8 Figure S6 . " width="250" height="auto" />Antibody Gal 8, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody gal 8/product/Novus Biologicals Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody gal 8 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
antibodies recombinant full length human gal8 Figure S6 . " width="250" height="auto" />Antibodies Recombinant Full Length Human Gal8, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies recombinant full length human gal8/product/R&D Systems Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies recombinant full length human gal8 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Abcam
human gal 8 antibody ![]() Human Gal 8 Antibody, supplied by Abcam, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/human gal 8 antibody/product/Abcam Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human gal 8 antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
human gal 8 ![]() Human Gal 8, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/human gal 8/product/R&D Systems Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human gal 8 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
91/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Millipore
recombinant human 6-histidine-tagged gal8 (his-gal8 ![]() Recombinant Human 6 Histidine Tagged Gal8 (His Gal8, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human 6-histidine-tagged gal8 (his-gal8/product/Millipore Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human 6-histidine-tagged gal8 (his-gal8 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Figure S1 and Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
Article Title: Discovery of galectin-8 as an LILRB4 ligand driving M-MDSCs defines a class of antibodies to fight solid tumors
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101374
Figure Lengend Snippet: Gal-8 was associated with myeloid cell-mediated immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment and binds soluble and membrane LILRB4 (A) Framework diagram of this research. (B) Venn diagram demonstrating Gal-8 with a specific expression pattern. (C) Analysis with the TIDE algorithm shows that LGALS8 plays an important role in T cell dysfunction in the tumor microenvironment. The Z score indicates the interaction term in the Cox proportional hazards model and represents the risk coefficient of LGALS8 expression level and T cell dysfunction. The p value represents the significance of Gal-8 as a risk coefficient. (D) The LGALS8 gene expression value in T cell exclusion signatures calculated with the TIDE algorithm. The association score ( Z score) of T cell exclusion signatures evaluates how LGALS8 associates with immunosuppressive cell types that drive T cell exclusion. (E) The TIMER 2.0 algorithm was used to calculate the MDSC fraction and correlation with LGALS8 expression in the indicated types of tumors from the TCGA dataset. Rho and p values are as shown. (F) ELISA screening of potential immune checkpoint receptors revealed LILRB4 as a Gal-8 interactor. (G) Intracellular localization of LILRB4 and Gal-8 proteins by fluorescence microscopy. Coexpression with LILRB4 colocalized the Gal-8 protein with LILRB4 at the cell membrane, whereas overexpression alone localized the Gal-8 protein within the cytoplasm. Scale bar, 10 μm. (H) Immune blotting of coimmunoprecipitation of FLAG-tagged Gal-8 and hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged LILRB4. (I) BLI assay showing the association-disassociation curve between Gal-8 and LILRB4. The kinetics constants are as follows: kon = 1.29 × 10 5 (1/ms); koff = 1.31 × 10 −1 (1/s); K D = 1.02 μM. See also
Article Snippet: The high-affinity 96-well ELISA plate (42592, Costar) were coated with
Techniques: Membrane, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Over Expression
Figure S2 and Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
Article Title: Discovery of galectin-8 as an LILRB4 ligand driving M-MDSCs defines a class of antibodies to fight solid tumors
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101374
Figure Lengend Snippet: Gal-8 binds LILRB4 to induce MDSC expansion (A) Affinity of Fc-tagged Gal-8 protein and HEK293 cell-expressed LILRB4 represented by EC 50 of flow cytometry assay. (B) Schematic illustration of experiment design. (C) Heatmap of the transcriptome sequencing data of CD14 + cells. Each group contains 3 biological replicates. (D) Volcano plot of the transcriptome sequencing data. The analysis was performed based on the false discovery rate q value. The top-ranked genes were strongly correlated with MDSC phenotype and function. (E) GSEA showing RNA sequencing–based monocyte signature evaluated in the context of gene sets representative of immune functions. (F) Flow cytometry assay detecting the percentage of M-MDSC with or without Gal-8 or APOE treatment. CD11b + , CD33 + , HLA-DR low/− , and live monocytes were defined as M-MDSCs. Statistical results were obtained from 3 biological replicates and represented as mean ± SEM. (G) T cell proliferation assay showing that monocytes exposed to Gal-8 inhibited T cell function in a concentration-dependent manner. The T cell suppression rate represents the percentage of decreased proliferation rate compared to the control group (whose suppression rate was zero). Data were obtained from biological replicates and represented as mean ± SEM. See also
Article Snippet: The high-affinity 96-well ELISA plate (42592, Costar) were coated with
Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Sequencing, RNA Sequencing Assay, Proliferation Assay, Cell Function Assay, Concentration Assay
Figure S3 . " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
Article Title: Discovery of galectin-8 as an LILRB4 ligand driving M-MDSCs defines a class of antibodies to fight solid tumors
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101374
Figure Lengend Snippet: Gal-8-LILRB4 interaction activates STAT3 and inhibits NF-κB pathway (A) Immune blotting of 3 potential protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) downstream of LILRB4. Among the 3 PTPs, the phosphorylation level of SHP1 was significantly affected by Gal-8. The statistical plot shows the pSHP1/SHP ratio. (B and C) Immune blotting demonstrates the phosphorylation level of NF-κB and STAT3 with or without Gal-8 treatment in THP-1 (B) and MV411(C) cells. (D) Immune blotting of nuclear and extranuclear proteins of Vector and LILRB4 KD THP-1 cells. (E) Immune blotting of human CD14 + cells treated with or without Gal-8 for 48 or 72 h. The results were constant with what was observed in THP-1 and MV411 cell lines. (F) Immune blotting of S100A8/9 and SOCS3 in human CD14 + cells treated with or without Gal-8. (G and H) Immune blotting of TRAF6 ubiquitination in THP-1 cells with or without LILRB4 KD (G) and with or without Gal-8 treatment (H). The immune blotting was detected with an anti-K63 Ubi antibody. (I) NF-κB reporter gene signal intensity in THP-1 cells cocultured with Gal-8-overexpressing HEK293 cells or control HEK293 cells for 3 days before reporter signals were detected. (J) Immune blotting of ADAM17 expression alteration in THP-1 cells treated with different concentrations of Gal-8 and in Vector and LILRB4-KD THP-1 cells. Of all the statistical analysis of immune blotting results, data were obtained from 3 biological replicates and represented as mean ± SEM. See also
Article Snippet: The high-affinity 96-well ELISA plate (42592, Costar) were coated with
Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Expressing
Figure S4 . " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
Article Title: Discovery of galectin-8 as an LILRB4 ligand driving M-MDSCs defines a class of antibodies to fight solid tumors
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101374
Figure Lengend Snippet: Gal-8 and LILRB4 interaction alters the microenvironment and promotes tumor growth in vivo (A) ELISA results detecting binding capacity of mouse LILRB4 and human Gal-8 proteins. Human Gal-8 was coated on ELISA plates and incubated with murine LILRB4-Fc protein. (B) Strategic diagram of tumor transplant mice model (n = 8). (C) B16 tumor volume. (D) Photograph of B16 tumor in vivo and ex vivo . (E) Survival curves of tumor-bearing mice. (F) Tumor-infiltrating M-MDSC level detected by flow cytometry assay. The proportion of M-MDSC to CD45 + CD11b + cells was statistically compared. (G and H) Ratio of M-MDSCs in the peripheral blood (G) and spleens (H) of mice bearing B16 tumors. (I‒L) Tumor infiltrating FOXP3 + Tregs and CD8 + T cells in tumor IHC assay. (I) Under a 40× objective lens, 5 fields of view were randomly captured on each tumor sample slide, and the number of FOXP3 + cells in these fields of view was counted and averaged, which was recorded as the FOXP3 + cell level of that sample. (J) Five 20× fields of view were randomly captured on each slide, and the area of positive staining was calculated using ImageJ and recorded as the CD8 + area level for that sample. The FOXP3 + and CD8 + level was statistically compared for each group of 8 samples. All of the statistical data mentioned above was represented as mean ± SEM. (K) FOXP3 + cells stained in B16 tumor (scale bar, 100 μm). (L) CD8 + cells stained in B16 tumor (scale bar, 250 μm). (M) Mechanistic diagram demonstrating downstream signaling of Gal-8-LILRB4. See also
Article Snippet: The high-affinity 96-well ELISA plate (42592, Costar) were coated with
Techniques: In Vivo, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Binding Assay, Incubation, Ex Vivo, Flow Cytometry, Staining
Figure S5 and Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
Article Title: Discovery of galectin-8 as an LILRB4 ligand driving M-MDSCs defines a class of antibodies to fight solid tumors
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101374
Figure Lengend Snippet: Anti-LILRB4 monoclonal antibodies that bind specific epitopes blocked Gal-8-LILRB4 interaction and tumor growth (A) The process of producing mouse anti-LILRB4 monoclonal antibodies from hybridoma. (B) Results of epitope binning and schematic diagram. Antibodies were categorized into 4 bins according to their binding epitope. (C) Clones 4–25 competed with other bin 4 clones but not clones from other bins to bind LILRB4 antigen in the BLI system. The shift of BLI did not increase when antibodies competed for the same epitope, whereas antibodies binding to a different epitope continued to bind to the antigen, further increasing the shift. (D) The blocking capacity of bin 4 antibodies represented by ELISA IC 50 . Statistical results were obtained from 3 replicate wells and represented as mean ± SEM. (E) The affinity curve of clones 3–11 and 4–15 antibodies detected and analyzed with the BLI system. (F) ELISA results demonstrating the linear epitope of the clones 3–11 antibody. The clones 3–11 antibody was shown to bind peptide P10 predominantly. (G) Epitope mapping of clones 3–11 antibody. Mutated amino acid sites with more significant interference on the ELISA binding signal were labeled darker in the figure. These amino acid sites and their binding signals were marked based on the molecular structure of the extracellular domain of LILRB4. (H) Flow cytometry assay revealed binding to THP-1 cells of the antibodies from different bins. (I) Flow cytometry assay of M-MDSC. The gating strategy was as described above. Compared with the mouse immunoglobulin G (msIgG), the clones 3–11 and 4–25 antibodies reduced the expansion of MDSC induced by Gal-8. (J) The Fab segment of clones 4–25 antibody reversed Gal-8-induced STAT3 activation and NF-κB inhibition in CD14 + monocytes. (K) Clones 4–25 antibody inhibited the growth of Gal-8 overexpressed tumors in vivo compared with isotype control. (L) Mechanism diagram of the blocking effect of anti-LILRB4 antibodies. See also
Article Snippet: The high-affinity 96-well ELISA plate (42592, Costar) were coated with
Techniques: Binding Assay, Clone Assay, Blocking Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Labeling, Flow Cytometry, Activation Assay, Inhibition, In Vivo
Figure S6 . " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: Cell Reports Medicine
Article Title: Discovery of galectin-8 as an LILRB4 ligand driving M-MDSCs defines a class of antibodies to fight solid tumors
doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101374
Figure Lengend Snippet: Anti-Gal-8 monoclonal antibody that blocked Gal-8-LILRB4 interaction had a similar effect on tumor growth with anti-LILRB4 antibody (A) Binding signals of Gal-8 antibody clones to human and cynomolgus antigens. The antibodies were developed by immunizing mice and identified by phage display technology. (B) Results of epitope binning by the BLI system. The result was analyzed and visualized by Cytoscape 3.9. (C) The blocking capacity of antibodies of different epitopes. The clone names for antibodies numbered 36 and 34 are A237 and A269, respectively. (D) Competitive binding of LILRB4 and A269 to human Gal-8. In the BLI system, the probe was coated with A269 antibody following association with Gal-8 (step 1). Afterward, the association of LILRB4 was blocked by A269 but not A237, another Gal-8 antibody (step 2), indicating that clone A269 blocked the binding of Gal-8 and LILRB4. (E and F) Binding kinetics of anti-Gal-8 antibody, clone A269 (E), and clone A237 (F) to human Gal-8 protein. A global fit of data was obtained from the association and dissociation phase with a 2-fold concentration series. (G‒J) Tumor growth curves and ex vivo tumor image for PBMC humanized A375 (G and H) and Hct116 (I and J) cell-line-derived tumor xenograft models. The drugs were given intraperitoneally once every 3 days as described. (K and L) Tissue microarray analysis of Gal-8 expression in melanoma clinical samples. IHC staining of Gal-8 on 46 melanoma samples was scored and categorized. (M and N) Treatment with the A269 antibody (anti-Gal-8) alone or in combination with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) in the MC38 in vivo transplant tumor model. MC38 cells overexpressing human Gal-8 were used to establish a subcutaneous graft tumor model. Drugs were given intraperitoneally once every 3 days. All of the statistical data in this figure were represented as mean ± SEM. See also
Article Snippet: The high-affinity 96-well ELISA plate (42592, Costar) were coated with
Techniques: Binding Assay, Clone Assay, Blocking Assay, Concentration Assay, Ex Vivo, Derivative Assay, Microarray, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry, In Vivo
Figure S6 . " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: Cell Reports
Article Title: Mechanistic insights into COVID-19 by global analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 3CL pro substrate degradome
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109892
Figure Lengend Snippet: 3CL pro disrupts galectin-8 binding to Spike in antiviral-autophagy (A) Immunoblot of human galectin-8 (Gal8) in BEAS-2B cells in response to IFN- α , IFN-β, or vehicle. One way ANOVA and Dunnett's posthoc test (mean ± SD, n = 3 each, *** p ≤ 0.001, * p ≤ 0.05). (B) MALDI-TOF-MS of intact versus 3CL pro -cleaved synthetic Gal8 P4–P4’ peptide. (C) SDS-PAGE and Edman sequencing of Gal8 incubated with 3CL pro +/− inhibitor GC376, or 3CL pro C145A (1:5 mol/mol, E:S). (D) Structural model of Gal8 docked onto 3CL pro . 3CL pro cleavage site identified by the neo-N-terminal peptide (red) in 9/9 independent TAILS analyses. (E) Gal8 immunoblots of lysates from primary HAECs incubated with 3CL pro or 3CL pro -C145A (1:200 w/w, E:S) for 18 h, 37°C (N = 5). (F) Gal8 immunoblot of infected Calu-3 cells at 24 (n = 4) and 48 (n = 4) hpi (MOI 1.0, mock n = 3). β-actin and β-tubulin loading controls. (G) ELISA of SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 protein binding intact Gal8 or 3CL pro -cleaved (ΔGal8) (mean ± SD, n = 2, N = 2, ∗∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.0001, ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01, ns p > 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparison test). (H) Immunoprecipitation (IP) by α-FLAG agarose-beads of HeLa cell lysates co-transfected with GFP-NDP52, WT-Gal8-FLAG or C-Gal8 (159-317)-FLAG. (I) Intact or cleaved Gal8 binding immobilized NDP52 detected with anti-C-Gal8 antibody. Student's t test, (mean ± SD, n = 3, N = 2, ns p > 0.05). (J) NDP52 binding Spike S1-associated intact or cleaved ΔGal8 (mean ± SD, n = 2, N = 2, ∗∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.0001, ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001, ∗ p ≤ 0.05, ns p > 0.05, two-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparison test). (K) Confocal microscopy of NDP52 and FLAG immunofluorescence after osmotic shock of HEK293 cells transfected with FLAG-tagged (WT) Gal8, N-Gal8 (1-158), or C-Gal8 (159-317). Scale bar, 20 μm. Quantification of NDP52 and Gal8-positive puncta, mean ± SD, n = 30, N = 5, ∗∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.0001, ns p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (L) Human lung tissue sections from normal subjects (N = 3) and post-mortem COVID-19 patients (N = 4) stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), DAPI (blue) and immunofluorescence on the same sections for Gal8 (green), NDP52 (red), Spike (magenta) and merged image (orange). Scale bar, 50 μm. (M) Numbers of immunopositive cells for Gal8, NDP52 and Gal8 colocalized with NDP52 in healthy versus COVID-19 lung tissue. Total cell count distribution shown as a scatter dot plot, bar = median. See also
Article Snippet: To detect the bound protein, mouse monoclonal anti-His-tag antibody (1:1,000, Cedarlane Labs, CLH101AP) (for Spike S1 glycoprotein) or
Techniques: Binding Assay, Western Blot, SDS Page, Sequencing, Incubation, Infection, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Protein Binding, Comparison, Immunoprecipitation, Transfection, Confocal Microscopy, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Cell Counting
Journal: Cell Reports
Article Title: Mechanistic insights into COVID-19 by global analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 3CL pro substrate degradome
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109892
Figure Lengend Snippet:
Article Snippet: To detect the bound protein, mouse monoclonal anti-His-tag antibody (1:1,000, Cedarlane Labs, CLH101AP) (for Spike S1 glycoprotein) or
Techniques: Virus, Recombinant, Sequencing, Fluorescence, Modification, Protease Inhibitor, Polymer, Staining, Blocking Assay, Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Western Blot, Synthesized, Software, Control, Targeted Proteomics, Microscopy, Spectrophotometry, Mass Spectrometry
Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR
Article Title: circHMGCS1–016 reshapes immune environment by sponging miR-1236-3p to regulate CD73 and GAL-8 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02095-2
Figure Lengend Snippet: circHMGCS1–016 regulates the miR-1236-3p/GAL-8 and CD73 axis in the ICC cells. A . The overlapped differentiated proteins were shown. For differentially expressed proteins (left panel), the GO and KEGG analysis were performed; B . Western blot for CD73 and GAL-8 proteins in modified RBE and QBC939 cells; C . Putative binding site of miR-1236-3p with respect to GAL-8 and CD73 via StarBase v3.0. D . The luciferase activity of pLG3-CD73 or GAL-8 in the 293 T cells co-transfected with miR-1236-3p. Data are representative of 3 independent tests (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05); E . The levels of CD73 or GAL-8 proteins were determined by western blot in the ICC cells with different miR-1236-3p or circHMGCS1–016 expression; F . The level of GAL-8 in the supernatant from ICC cells with different miR-1236-3p or circHMGCS1–016 expression was determined; Data are representative of 3 independent tests (*** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05); G . The level of sCD73 in the supernatant from ICC cells with different miR-1236-3p or circHMGCS1–016 expression was determined; Data are representative of 3 independent tests(*** p < 0.001); H . The level of adenosine concentration in the supernatant from ICC cells with different miR-1236-3p or circHMGCS1–016 expression was determined; Data are representative of 3 independent test; I and J. A co-culture showed the supernatant from ICC cells overexpressing circHMGCS1–016 inhibited the CD4 + and CD8 + T cell proliferation; Data are representative of 3 independent tests (*** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05); K. Chemokine chips and ELISA were employed to determine the different chemokines in the supernatant between RBE-control, RBE-circHMGCS1–016 and RBE-shmiR-1236-3p groups
Article Snippet: Rabbit polyclonal to human CD73 antibody (1:1000, ab237757, Abcam, USA), Rabbit monoclonal [EPR3610] to
Techniques: Western Blot, Modification, Binding Assay, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Transfection, Expressing, Concentration Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR
Article Title: circHMGCS1–016 reshapes immune environment by sponging miR-1236-3p to regulate CD73 and GAL-8 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02095-2
Figure Lengend Snippet: GAL-8 and CD73 interference restraints the function of circHMGCS1–016 in ICC cells. A . The relative level of CD73 and GAL-8 was measured by qRT-PCR in the ICC cells; Data are representative of 3 independent tests; B . The expression of CD73 and GAL-8 were modified by lentivirus-mediated knockdown in RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells. Data are representative of 3 independent tests(*** p < 0.001); C . The efficacy of GAL-8/CD73 interference was analyzed by western blot; D . Invasion assay was performed to detect the invasion ability of RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells and RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells with CD73 and GAL-8 interference (Bar = 200 μm). Data are representative of 3 independent tests(*** p < 0.001); E . Colony formation assay was performed to detect the ability of colony formation in RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells and RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells with CD73 and GAL-8 interference. Data are representative of 3 independent tests(*** p < 0.001); F . The level of GAL-8 in the supernatant of RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells and RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells with CD73 and GAL-8 interference; Data are representative of 3 independent tests(*** p < 0.001); G . The level of adenosine concentration in the supernatant of RBE-circHMGCS1_016 cells and RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells with CD73 and GAL-8 interference; Data are representative of 3 independent tests(** p < 0.01); H . A co-culture showed the supernatant from RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells inhibited the CD4 + and CD8 + T cell proliferation compared to RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells with CD73 and GAL-8 interference (*** p < 0.001); I . Chemokine chips and ELISA were employed to determine the different chemokines in the supernatant between RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells and RBE-circHMGCS1–016 cells with CD73 and GAL-8 interference; J . A model for circHMGCS1–016 driven ICC development and established the immune privilege microenvironment
Article Snippet: Rabbit polyclonal to human CD73 antibody (1:1000, ab237757, Abcam, USA), Rabbit monoclonal [EPR3610] to
Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Modification, Western Blot, Invasion Assay, Colony Assay, Concentration Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR
Article Title: circHMGCS1–016 reshapes immune environment by sponging miR-1236-3p to regulate CD73 and GAL-8 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02095-2
Figure Lengend Snippet: The relationship among circHMGCS1–016, CD73 and GAL-8 in ICC tissues. A . CD73 and GAL-8 levels in 40 pairs of ICC and matched adjacent non-tumor tissues. Data was shown as log 2 (T/N) ; B . Representative images for CD73 and GAL-8 staining of ICC and matched adjacent nontumor tissues (Bar = 100 μm); C . Representative images for circHMGCS1–016, CD73, GAL-8, CD4 and CD8 staining of ICC tissues (Bar = 200 μm); D . Correlation analysis showed the positive relationship between circHMGCS1–016 and CD73( R 2 = 0.7379, p = 3.45E-18), circHMGCS1–016 and GAL-8 ( R 2 = 0.6747, p = 5.87E-16). But circHMGCS1_016 expression was adversely related to the level of CD8 ( R 2 = 0.1299, p = 6.45E-17) and CD4 ( R 2 = 0.2157, p = 1.17E-14). The relationship between CD8 and CD73( R 2 = 0.3711, p = 1.81E-12), CD8 and GAL-8 ( R 2 = 0. 4244, p = 2.12E-23) was also analyzed (*** p < 0.001)
Article Snippet: Rabbit polyclonal to human CD73 antibody (1:1000, ab237757, Abcam, USA), Rabbit monoclonal [EPR3610] to
Techniques: Staining, Expressing
Journal: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research : CR
Article Title: circHMGCS1–016 reshapes immune environment by sponging miR-1236-3p to regulate CD73 and GAL-8 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02095-2
Figure Lengend Snippet: Higher levels of circHMGCS1–016 correlated with resistance to anti-PD1 therapy in mice and ICC patients. A . Representative images of the RBE orthotopic ICC tumors from humanized NSG mice ( n = 3 /group). B . Tumor growth volume of the RBE orthotopic planted humanized mice from each group (*** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01); C . The level of GAL-8 in the serum of the RBE orthotopic ICC tumors from each group; Data are representative of 3 independent tests (*** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05, n.s. p > 0.05); D . The level of adenosine concentration in the serum of mice planted with the RBE orthotopic ICC tumors; Data are representative of 3 independent tests(** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05); E . The CD8 + and CD4 + T cells in the blood of mice planted with the RBE orthotopic ICC tumors (*** p < 0.001); F. At study endpoint, the CD8 + and CD4 + T cells in IgG and PD-1 treatment group were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (Bar = 200 μm); G . Representative ICC cases from 12 patients who received PD-1 antibody treatment were analyzed by IHC staining for CD8 and circHMGCS1–016 (Bar = 200 μm); H . Twelve patients were divided into two groups according to circHMGCS1–016 expression, and patients in CR, PR, SD, and PD were shown in each group. I . The efficacy of PD1 antibody immunotherapy was assessed by MRI based on RECIST1.1. J . The number of CD8 + cells was significantly different between two groups(** p < 0.01)
Article Snippet: Rabbit polyclonal to human CD73 antibody (1:1000, ab237757, Abcam, USA), Rabbit monoclonal [EPR3610] to
Techniques: Concentration Assay, Immunohistochemistry, Expressing